ico-electricity [ GWh of Electricity Saved: ] 190K
ico-job [ Jobs Impact: ]
  • LOW
  • HIGH
ico-cost [ Budget Impact: ]
  • LOW
  • HIGH
ico-pollution [ Conventional Pollutants Reduced: ]

SO225,002 tons
NOx20,638 tons
Hg.33 tons
PM3832 tons


ico-reduced [ Megatons of GHG Reduced: ] 182


From iPads to cell phones to televisions to radios, the average household now owns 24 electronic devices.1 Coupled with appliances, electronics have grown from 17% of residential energy use in 1978 to more than 31% by 20052 and are still annually growing by 6%.3 As much as 10%4 of the 359,000 GWh of electricity consumed by these devices in 20065 can be attributed to times when they aren’t in use, just in “standby mode”.6 800 million devices are bought annually,7 rapid turnover that could help make the 5 billion consumer electronic devices in the U.S.8 more efficient quickly. Instead, each new device requires more, often dirty, energy from the grid, contributing more than 600 megatons of GHG emissions to the atmosphere annually.9


Consumer electronics face a unique set of challenges. First, consumer electronics is a hodge-podge of regulatory standards, both mandatory and voluntary. Second, consumer purchasing behaviors are more like “fashion” than most other energy or efficiency decisions.

DOE sets minimum efficiency standards for a range of residential electronics and appliances, from dishwashers to dehumidifiers,10 but many common categories, such as televisions11 and battery chargers (like your phone uses)12 are still in development. As a result of the sizeable potential efficiency gains and long timelines, some states, such as California, pass electronics standards, leading to patchwork regulations.13 On the other end of the efficiency spectrum, the Energy Star program allows products to voluntarily certify as particularly energy efficient, but it can only effect those products that opt in to the program.14 This hodgepodge of standards makes it costly for manufacturers and stifles innovation.15

In the case of consumer electronics, both buying patterns and buying criteria are different than many other home-sector purchases. Buying patterns are difficult to predict, with new types of electronics developing over a relatively short time span. For instance, set-top boxes, such as cable boxes or digital video recorders(DVR), were historically high power consumers,16 and propagated quickly, with DVRs gaining a place in 43% of households over 10 years.17 While set-top box makers have since improved energy efficiency and created voluntary efficiency standards,18 many other devices continue to waste energy. For these other electronics, like computers, consumers buying criteria is often functionality, with efficiency rarely considered.19


To overcome the unique challenges of consumer electronics, a multi-faceted approach that makes efficient options available to end users is necessary.

Expand and Improve Efficiency Standards

DOE should issue energy efficiency rules for categories not currently covered or being adequately addressed through voluntary energy efficiency measures. When appropriate, DOE should also encourage voluntary energy efficiency initiatives to expedite energy savings for consumers, as has been seen with cable boxes.20 Adoption of high minimum efficiency standards could save consumers money and reduce the regulatory burden for manufacturers, while reducing the need for energy. For instance, in the case of battery chargers, if DOE were to adopt the stricter California minimum efficiency standard21 in place of the current DOE proposal,22 Americans would save an estimated $1B annually and eliminate the need for 2GW of electricity generating capacity.23 With similar, higher standards in place across consumer electronics, energy would be saved without any change in consumer behavior.

Mandate Efficient Federal Procurement

Similar to the executive order signed by President George W. Bush in 2001,24 the Obama administration should work with federal agencies to ensure that all off-the-shelf electronics procured, not only battery chargers, meet high energy efficiency standards. Creating a large market for more efficient electronics would encourage manufacturers to make such models, providing average consumers with energy-saving options.

Create a Green Distribution Public-Private Partnership

The DOE should create a partnership with retailers of electronics that encourages and incentivizes retailers to devote more stock and more attractive product placement to efficient options. Similar to programs by several utilities that promote efficient products, this type of program has proven highly effective in saving energy by increasing customer access to and awareness of efficient electronics options.25